Site icon Dr Low Chai Ling

Why Fillers Go Wrong

Nobody walks out of a consultation asking to look overfilled. And yet a great many people end up there, having said yes to something reasonable at every individual step.

That is the part worth understanding. Overfilled faces are rarely the product of one bad decision. They are the product of ten sensible ones, taken in sequence, by someone who was only ever looking at one area at a time.

I have covered this on video as well:

The first error: treating the complaint instead of the cause

A patient points at her nasolabial fold. The fold is filled. The fold becomes shallower. Everyone is satisfied for about four months.

But the fold was a symptom. What produced it was loss of support higher up — in the midface, in the deep fat compartments, sometimes in the bone beneath. Filling the crease treats the shadow rather than the thing casting it. The face becomes fuller without becoming younger, which is a peculiar outcome to pay for.

This is the single most common route to an unnatural result, and it almost never feels like a mistake at the time.

The second error: the face is never assessed as one composition

Cheeks are filled at one visit. Six months later, the chin. A year later, the temples, because the cheeks have made the temples look hollow by comparison.

Each decision is defensible. The cumulative result is a face that has been enlarged rather than restored, and by then the reference point has drifted so gradually that neither doctor nor patient can quite say when it happened.

The literature now has a term for the end state — facial overfilled syndrome. Widened midface, flattened transitions, loss of the shadows that give a face dimension. The characteristic look is not of a face that has had too much of any one thing, but of a face that has lost its architecture.

The third error: importing a template

Aesthetic ideals travel faster than the anatomy they were designed for. A projection pattern that suits one facial structure, applied wholesale to a different one, does not produce the same face. It produces a mismatch.

This matters particularly in Asian faces, where the relationship between midface projection, bone structure and soft tissue differs from the templates that dominate most of the marketing imagery. Volume placed by protocol rather than by assessment tends to read as generic at best.

What good filler work looks like

Mostly, it looks like nothing. That is the frustrating part commercially and the entire point clinically.

The principles I work to:

If you already think you have had too much

You have options, and the first is not more filler.

Hyaluronic acid fillers can be dissolved with hyaluronidase. It is not a decision to take casually — dissolving is imprecise, it can take more than one session, and the face beneath will initially look worse than you remember, because you are seeing the deflated version before any recovery. But it is available, it works, and a doctor who will not discuss it is not the doctor for this conversation.

Not all injectables are reversible. Collagen stimulators such as PDLLA and polycaprolactone cannot be dissolved, which is precisely why they warrant a more conservative hand.

What to ask before anything is injected

Where I treat

I see patients at SW1 Clinic on Orchard Road, Singapore. If you are considering fillers — or you have had them and are uneasy about the result — an assessment of the whole face is the sensible starting point.

Exit mobile version